Lifestyle or Genes?
The Health Secrets of a 114-Year Old Man -A Galaxy Insight
A research on the bone health of one of the oldest persons
in the world raises the question of which has the most
effect on the human lifespan: genetics or a healthy lifestyle
or some combination of the two? Research reveals that
there were no genetic modifications which could have
contributed to the longevity of a 114-year old Spaniard.
The research team, directed by Universitat Autònoma
de Barcelona professor Adolfo Díez Pérez,
pointed out a healthy lifestyle, a Mediterranean diet,
a temperate climate and daily cycling until the age of
102 as the reasons for his excellent health.
The research team studied the bone mass and analysed
the genetics of a man with enviable health who at the
time of the study was 113 years old. The research was
carried out with four other members of his family:
a 101-year-old brother, two daughters aged 81 and 77,
and a nephew aged 85, all of them born and still living
in a small town of the island of Menorca. The research
findings reported that the man's bones were in excellent
conditions: his bone mass was normal, there were no
anomalous curvatures and he had never sustained a fracture.
With regard to the genetical analysis, researchers
were unsuccessful in finding any mutations in the KLOTHO
gene, which is generally related to a good level
of mineral density and therefore healthy bones. Neither
did they find any mutations in the LRP5
gene, which is associated with longevity. None
of the members of the family who participated in the
study presented any mutations in this gene.
The results of the research do not rule out the possibility
that other genetic mutations could positively influence
longevity. However, researchers do point out the fact
that the excellent health of this family, and of the
113-year-old man in particular, is probably due to
a Mediterranean diet, the temperate climate of the
island, a lack of stress and regular physical activity.
The article underlines the fact that until the age
of 102, the man cycled every day and looked after the
family orchard.
The human life-span and the nature vs nurture question
raises the question of why do animals age so differently?
Why is it that a tortoise, for example, can live well
over a hundred years, while another similarly sized
animal would be lucky to live just 10? What’s
the big difference?
| Every atom in the Universe has a
frequency. Whether it's a grain of sand, a
piece of steel, a plant, animal or an organ
in your body, each cell resonates, or vibrates,
at a specific frequency or oscillation. Your
body consists of a variety of atoms, which
contain photons, electrons & an overall
bio-electric energy that runs through it. The
way you take care of your body physically,
emotionally and mentally determines how many
negative frequencies or toxins are being built
up in it. There are four general ways imbalance
in the body is created. Through toxic substances
we eat, pollution we breathe, exposure to a
negative energetic environment, and how we
process information in our thinking & feeling. |
Scientists say that the secret lies
in genetic expression. A new genetic database could
help reveal how and why animals age so differently.
The process of mapping out this molecular maze will
likely unlock some of the hidden secrets of increased
longevity in humans along the way.
In some instances, even very closely related animals
have drastically different life spans, a fact that
has puzzled scientists for years. Mice for example
live for about two years while their rodent cousins,
the Southern flying squirrel, can live for two decades
or so. Chimps and humans are 99 percent genetically
identical, so why do humans live twice as long? New
databases are helping to identify the genetic expressions
that accounts for these vastly varying life spans.
In a study of mice, researchers at Stanford University
and the National Institute on Aging (NIA),
have now generated a database that catalogues how gene
expression, the measure for how active a gene is, changes
in various parts of the body as the animal ages. Their
findings indicate that different tissues age quite
differently over time.
Previous studies have examined how gene expression
changes with age in specific parts of the body, such
as the brain or the hearts of both mice and humans.
But the new study, commissioned by the NIA, simultaneously
analyzed the activity of thousands of genes in 16 different
tissues at different points during the animals' lives.
This has allowed researchers to compare age-related
patterns of gene expression between different organs.
| Lakhovsky’s spectacular results
in the treatment of plants and animals and
human beings were inevitably bound to antagonize
orthodox practitioners and exponents of popular
medical cults.>>> More |
The results, published earlier this week
in the journal PLoS
Genetics, established that the two main culprits
previously believed to be primary contributors to the
aging process—increased inflammation and slowed
metabolism—are indeed guilty parties. But the
researchers did find large disparities depending on
the different tissues of the body. For example, expression
profiles in the liver, brain, and muscle changed little
with age, whereas the lungs, eyes, and thymus (an immune
organ) experienced more radical transformations.
The researchers compared their results with other
previous studies analyzing gene-expression. They analyzed
the aging brain, muscle, and kidney tissue in humans,
flies, and worms.
Now
this is where it gets interesting
The researchers found
one central theme to gene expression and aging
in all four species. They all developed a slowing
of the cells’ energy factories.
Georges Lakhovsky
In 1925, Georges Lakhovsky published a paper,
His expressed philosophy was that “the
amplitude of cell oscillations must reach a
certain value, in order that the organism be
strong enough to repulse the destructive vibrations
from certain microbes.” He goes on to
say, “The remedy in my opinion, is not
to kill the microbes in contact with the healthy
cells but to reinforce the oscillations of
the cell either directly by reinforcing the
radio activity of the blood or in producing
on the cells a direct action by means of the
proper rays.” Lakhovsky’s Radio-Cellulo-Oscillator
(RCO) produced low frequency ELF all the way
through gigahertz radiowaves with lots of “extremely
short harmonics.” He favored such a wide
bandwidth device so that, “The cells
with very weak vibrations, when placed in the
field of multiple vibrations, finds its own
frequency and starts again to oscillate normally
through the phenomenon of resonance.” As
a result, Lakhovsky’s RCO is now more
often called MWO (multiple wave oscillator)
for these reasons. |
In each
species, expression of genes related to energy
production dropped twofold by the time the species
reached the end of its life span—2 years
for mice and around 80 for humans.
A scientist explains it this way.
A NORMAL cell has an electrical potential of
70 millivolts, an AGED cell at 50 mV, and a
CANCER or ill cell is 15 mV. When a cell is
in electrical difficulty the mV and the sodium-potassium
balance are out. The high potential brings
the cells to an equal level basically resetting
them. This allows healing to occur at a higher
pace without stressing the cell. And the additional
energy restores cell integrity by reorienting
it's molecular structure to allow for easier
potential movement. Basically it bolsters the
field of each cell individually so they support
each other more easily...
|
"This
is the only common property of growing old between
the four different animals," says Stanford
biologist, Stuart Kim. "Maybe that should
alert us to say there is something unavoidable
to getting old."
Lakhovsky believed
that living cells are batteries; the nucleus
holds the positive charge and the cytoplasm
carries the negative. If cells were irradiated
with a range of electromagnetic oscillations,
they could be "recharged" and thus
rejuvenated. A range of frequencies is necessary
because the cell and its parts respond to
different frequencies.
Mainstream research supports the idea that "We
are electrical creatures using a biochemical
body to exist in an electro-chemical environment," as
Van Tassel wrote. The name "Integratron" actually
applies to a machine, a high-voltage electrostatic
generator, that would supply the range of frequencies
to recharge cell structure. Added to this are
certain magnetic field principles and Nikola
Tesla's technique of creating high ionization
static fields.
Healthy cells, according to Nobel
prize winner Otto Warburg, have cell voltages
of 70 to 90 millivolts. Due to the constant
stresses of modern life and a toxic environment,
cell voltage tends to drop as we age or get
sick. As the voltage drops, the cell is unable
to maintain a healthy environment for itself.
If the electrical charge of a cell drops
to 50, a person has chronic fatigue and gets
sick often. If the voltage drops to 15, the
cell becomes cancerous. |

| All cells have small electrically
powered pumps inside of them whose function
is to bring in nourishment, and take out toxins.
Imagine going into a house where the power
is out. The water pumps wouldn't operate so
the toilets wouldn't work. The would be no
running water, therefore no showers or baths
or doing dishes. The refrigerator wouldn't
work so there wouldn't be any food to eat,
and the food that was in there would go bad.
Add to that a garbage man strike, and now garbage
is piling up. As you could guess, anyone living
in that house would probably get sick.
It is the same for the cells of
the body. Without enough energy to operate,
the cells become toxic and malnourished.
Then, when presented with an infectious organism,
whether it is the virus that causes cancer,
or the common cold, they have lost the vitality
to resist.
The fastest way to raise cell voltages
is with an MWO.
Invented by Georges Lakhovsky in the early
1900's. Dr. Lakhovsky discovered that healthy
cells acted like little batteries and found
out how to recharge them (raise their voltages).
He found that transmitting energy in the
range between 750,000 hertz and 3,000,000,000
hertz raised the cell's voltage.
Please send this page to a friend
He had great results with all types
of physical imbalances, including cancer.
Not only was his unit able to return sick
cells (and people) to health, but those who
used it regularly noticed that they never
got sick anymore.
They both rely on the same principle,
that is, that life forms can absorb radio
wave energy. The MWO uses
that principle to strengthen the healthy
cells of the body so that they can resist
any physical imbalances. They both rely on
the same principle, that is, that life forms
can absorb radio wave energy
The
MWO
|
If, as Bob Beck suggested
in his article, the MWO tends to take the body
cell back down the time-track to a more youthful,
more vital period,
Opps now back to the plot
However, the researchers said there were not a lot
of universal similarities, which raises the question
of how well lab animals can really serve as models
for humans as we attempt to unravel the longevity mystery.
For example, studies have found that in humans, and
some other animals, that the length of repetitive strips
of DNA at the end of each chromosome, also known as
telomeres, is linked to aging. However, the researchers
didn't find changes in the expression of telomere-related
genes in aging mice.
"I wouldn't say that this means that model organisms
can't be used to study aging in humans," says
Promislow. "It does suggest there is a lot more
going on."
This analysis will likely be the first of many to
come that will take advantage of this new database,
know as AGEMAP.
Scientists are still working on figuring out the precise
functions of the intertwining genetic networks implicated
in aging. AGEMAP serves as a way to decipher differences
in genetic expression and better map out the ageing
process, especially as it relates to humans.
"The scale of this study is phenomenal," says
Promislow. "In some ways, this shows us where
things are likely to be headed in coming years in terms
of the kinds of experiments people will do to understand
the genetic basis of complex traits."
Posted by Casey Kazan with Rebecca Sato.
The electromotive force (emf)
produced by the MWO and induced in the cell
nucleus, can raise the cell's metabolic rate
by electrolysis, and perhaps jog the RNA-DNA "memory" and
reproductive capabilities to their level
at an earlier, younger age, thus the rejuvenation.
Even more subtle changes might be postulated,
such as a magnetic "progression" of
effects as evidenced by heavy water in magnetic
fields.
PERHAPS
Lakhovsky new in the 50's what Science claims
to be Discovering now,about the Aging process
| One professional couple 82 and 73(jewelers
still working)have been using the Mwo for
3 years,,, in a phone call he claims his
skin had gone back 20+ years ? |
|
Get your self an MWO NOW, lay away
it, or use your credit card no matter what
way, we will help you aquired one of these
amazing units.
Read
More Here
|
| Lakhovsky's Multiple Wave Oscillator |
Lakhovsky believed
that living cells are batteries; the nucleus
holds the positive charge and the cytoplasm carries
the negative. If cells were irradiated with a
range of electromagnetic oscillations, they could
be "recharged" and thus rejuvenated.
A range of frequencies is necessary because the
cell and its parts respond to different frequencies |
Related posts:
Can Humans Live to 1,000? Some Experts Claim We Can — Others
Want to Prevent That
The Immortalist: Aubrey De Grey on Aging -Can
He Keep Us Young?
Enhancing Evolution: Do
Humans have a Moral and Ethical Duty to Improve the
Human Race?
End of Aging -The
Next Great Paradigm Shift?
The Story of a Biologist & the Extension of the Human
Life Span
“ Longevity Genes” Solve
Centenarian Paradox
Pathway to Longevity
Discovered
“ Long Live The Queen!” Longevity & Queen
Bees
Links:
http://www.uab.es/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1096476786473&pagename=
UAB%2FPage%2FTemplatePlanaDivsNoticiesdetall¬iciaid=1208815810349
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030201&ct=1
http://www.nia.nih.gov/
http://med.stanford.edu/profiles/Stuart_Kim/
http://www2.genetics.uga.edu/faculty/bio-Promislow.html
|