Lifestyle or Genes?
The Health Secrets of a 114-Year Old Man -A Galaxy Insight
A research on the bone health of one of the oldest persons in the world
raises the question of which has the most effect on the human lifespan:
genetics or a healthy lifestyle or some combination of the two? Research
reveals that there were no genetic modifications which could have contributed
to the longevity of a 114-year old Spaniard. The research team, directed
by Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona professor Adolfo Díez
Pérez, pointed out a healthy lifestyle, a Mediterranean diet, a
temperate climate and daily cycling until the age of 102 as the reasons
for his excellent health.
The research team studied the bone mass and analysed the genetics of
a man with enviable health who at the time of the study was 113 years
old. The research was carried out with four other members of his family:
a 101-year-old brother, two daughters aged 81 and 77, and a nephew aged
85, all of them born and still living in a small town of the island of
Menorca. The research findings reported that the man's bones were in
excellent conditions: his bone mass was normal, there were no anomalous
curvatures and he had never sustained a fracture.
With regard to the genetical analysis, researchers were unsuccessful
in finding any mutations in the KLOTHO
gene, which is generally related to a good level of mineral density
and therefore healthy bones. Neither did they find any mutations in the LRP5
gene, which is associated with longevity. None of the members of
the family who participated in the study presented any mutations in this
gene.
The results of the research do not rule out the possibility that other
genetic mutations could positively influence longevity. However, researchers
do point out the fact that the excellent health of this family, and of
the 113-year-old man in particular, is probably due to a Mediterranean
diet, the temperate climate of the island, a lack of stress and regular
physical activity. The article underlines the fact that until the age
of 102, the man cycled every day and looked after the family orchard.
The human life-span and the nature vs nurture question raises the question
of why do animals age so differently? Why is it that a tortoise, for
example, can live well over a hundred years, while another similarly
sized animal would be lucky to live just 10? What’s the big difference?
| Every atom in the Universe has a frequency. Whether
it's a grain of sand, a piece of steel, a plant, animal or an
organ in
your body,
each cell resonates, or vibrates, at a specific frequency or oscillation.
Your body consists of a variety of atoms, which contain photons,
electrons & an overall bio-electric energy that runs through
it. The way you take care of your body physically, emotionally and
mentally determines how many negative frequencies or toxins are being
built up in it. There are four general ways imbalance in the body
is created. Through toxic substances we eat, pollution we breathe,
exposure to a negative energetic environment, and how we process
information in our thinking & feeling. |
Scientists say that the secret lies in genetic expression. A new genetic
database could help reveal how and why animals age so differently. The
process of mapping out this molecular maze will likely unlock some of
the hidden secrets of increased longevity in humans along the way.
In some instances, even very closely related animals have drastically
different life spans, a fact that has puzzled scientists for years. Mice
for example live for about two years while their rodent cousins, the
Southern flying squirrel, can live for two decades or so. Chimps and
humans are 99 percent genetically identical, so why do humans live twice
as long? New databases are helping to identify the genetic expressions
that accounts for these vastly varying life spans.
In a study of mice, researchers at Stanford University and the National
Institute on Aging (NIA), have now
generated a database that catalogues how gene expression, the measure
for how active a gene is, changes in various parts of the body as the
animal ages. Their findings indicate that different tissues age quite
differently over time.
Previous studies have examined how gene expression changes with age
in specific parts of the body, such as the brain or the hearts of both
mice and humans. But the new study, commissioned by the NIA, simultaneously
analyzed the activity of thousands of genes in 16 different tissues at
different points during the animals' lives. This has allowed researchers
to compare age-related patterns of gene expression between different
organs.
| Lakhovsky’s spectacular results in the treatment of plants
and animals and human beings were inevitably bound to antagonize
orthodox practitioners and
exponents of popular medical cults.>>> More |
The results, published earlier this week in the journal PLoS
Genetics, established that the two main culprits previously believed
to be primary contributors to the aging process—increased inflammation
and slowed metabolism—are indeed guilty parties. But the researchers
did find large disparities depending on the different tissues of the
body. For example, expression profiles in the liver, brain, and muscle
changed little with age, whereas the lungs, eyes, and thymus (an immune
organ) experienced more radical transformations.
The researchers compared their results with other previous studies analyzing
gene-expression. They analyzed the aging brain, muscle, and kidney tissue
in humans, flies, and worms.
Now this is where it gets interesting
The researchers found one central
theme to gene expression and aging in all four species. They all
developed a slowing of the cells’ energy factories.
Georges Lakhovsky
In 1925, Georges Lakhovsky published a paper,
His expressed philosophy was that “the amplitude of cell oscillations
must reach a certain value, in order that the organism be strong enough to
repulse the destructive vibrations from certain microbes.” He goes on
to say, “The remedy in my opinion, is not to kill the microbes in contact
with the healthy cells but to reinforce the oscillations of the cell either
directly by reinforcing the radio activity of the blood or in producing on
the cells a direct action by means of the proper rays.” Lakhovsky’s
Radio-Cellulo-Oscillator (RCO) produced low frequency ELF all the way through
gigahertz radiowaves with lots of “extremely short harmonics.” He
favored such a wide bandwidth device so that, “The cells with very weak
vibrations, when placed in the field of multiple vibrations, finds its own
frequency and starts again to oscillate normally through the phenomenon of
resonance.” As a result, Lakhovsky’s RCO is now more often called
MWO (multiple wave oscillator) for these reasons. |
In each species,
expression of genes related to energy production dropped twofold
by the
time the species reached the end of its life span—2 years for
mice and around 80 for humans.
A scientist explains it this way. A NORMAL cell has an electrical
potential of 70 millivolts, an AGED cell at 50 mV, and a CANCER or
ill cell is 15 mV. When a cell is in electrical difficulty the mV
and the sodium-potassium balance are out. The high potential brings
the cells to an equal level basically resetting them. This allows
healing to occur at a higher pace without stressing the cell.
And the additional energy restores cell integrity by reorienting
it's molecular structure to allow for easier potential movement.
Basically it bolsters the field of each cell individually so they
support each other more easily...
|
"This is the only common property of growing old between the four
different animals," says Stanford biologist, Stuart Kim. "Maybe
that should alert us to say there is something unavoidable to getting
old."
Lakhovsky believed that living cells
are batteries; the nucleus holds the positive charge and the
cytoplasm carries
the
negative.
If cells were irradiated with a range of electromagnetic oscillations,
they could be "recharged" and thus rejuvenated. A range
of frequencies is necessary because the cell and its parts respond
to different frequencies.
Mainstream research supports the idea that "We are electrical
creatures using a biochemical body to exist in an electro-chemical
environment," as Van Tassel wrote. The name "Integratron" actually
applies to a machine, a high-voltage electrostatic generator, that
would supply the range of frequencies to recharge cell structure.
Added to this are certain magnetic field principles and Nikola
Tesla's technique of creating high ionization static fields.
Healthy cells, according to Nobel prize winner Otto Warburg, have
cell voltages of 70 to 90 millivolts. Due to the constant stresses
of modern life and a toxic environment, cell voltage tends to drop
as we age or get sick. As the voltage drops, the cell is unable
to maintain a healthy environment for itself. If the electrical
charge of a cell drops to 50, a person has chronic fatigue and
gets sick often. If the voltage drops to 15, the cell becomes cancerous. |

| All cells have small electrically powered pumps inside of them
whose function is to bring in nourishment, and take out toxins. Imagine
going into a house where the power is out. The water pumps wouldn't
operate so the toilets wouldn't work. The would be no running water,
therefore no showers or baths or doing dishes. The refrigerator wouldn't
work so there wouldn't be any food to eat, and the food that was
in there would go bad. Add to that a garbage man strike, and now
garbage is piling up. As you could guess, anyone living in that house
would probably get sick.
It is the same for the cells of the body. Without enough energy
to operate, the cells become toxic and malnourished. Then, when
presented with an infectious organism, whether it is the virus
that causes cancer, or the common cold, they have lost the vitality
to resist.
The fastest way to raise cell voltages is with an MWO. Invented
by Georges Lakhovsky in the early 1900's. Dr. Lakhovsky discovered
that healthy cells acted like little batteries and found out how
to recharge them (raise their voltages). He found that transmitting
energy in the range between 750,000 hertz and 3,000,000,000 hertz
raised the cell's voltage.
Please send this page to a friend
He had great results with all types of physical imbalances, including
cancer. Not only was his unit able to return sick cells (and people)
to health, but those who used it regularly noticed that they never
got sick anymore.
They both rely on the same principle, that is, that life forms
can absorb radio wave energy. The MWO uses that principle to strengthen
the healthy cells of the body so that they can resist any physical
imbalances. They both rely on the same principle, that is, that
life forms can absorb radio wave energy
The MWO
|
If, as Bob Beck suggested in his article, the MWO tends to take the
body cell back down the time-track to a more youthful, more vital period,
Opps now back to the plot
However, the researchers said there were not a lot of universal similarities,
which raises the question of how well lab animals can really serve as
models for humans as we attempt to unravel the longevity mystery. For
example, studies have found that in humans, and some other animals, that
the length of repetitive strips of DNA at the end of each chromosome,
also known as telomeres, is linked to aging. However, the researchers
didn't find changes in the expression of telomere-related genes in aging
mice.
"I wouldn't say that this means that model organisms can't be used
to study aging in humans," says Promislow. "It does suggest
there is a lot more going on."
This analysis will likely be the first of many to come that will take
advantage of this new database, know as AGEMAP. Scientists are still
working on figuring out the precise functions of the intertwining genetic
networks implicated in aging. AGEMAP serves as a way to decipher differences
in genetic expression and better map out the ageing process, especially
as it relates to humans.
"The scale of this study is phenomenal," says Promislow. "In
some ways, this shows us where things are likely to be headed in coming
years in terms of the kinds of experiments people will do to understand
the genetic basis of complex traits."
Posted by Casey Kazan with Rebecca Sato.
The electromotive force (emf) produced by the MWO
and induced in the cell nucleus, can raise the cell's metabolic
rate
by electrolysis,
and perhaps jog the RNA-DNA "memory" and reproductive capabilities
to their level at an earlier, younger age, thus the rejuvenation.
Even more subtle changes might be postulated, such as a magnetic "progression" of
effects as evidenced by heavy water in magnetic fields.
PERHAPS Lakhovsky new in the 50's what Science claims to be Discovering
now,about the Aging process
| One professional couple 82 and 73(jewelers still working)have
been using the Mwo for 3 years,,, in a phone call he claims
his skin
had
gone
back
20+ years ? |
|
Get your self an MWO NOW, lay away it, or use your credit
card no matter what way, we will help you aquired one of these
amazing
units.
Read More Here
|
| Lakhovsky's Multiple Wave Oscillator |
Lakhovsky believed that living cells
are batteries; the nucleus holds the positive charge and the cytoplasm
carries the negative. If cells were irradiated with a range of
electromagnetic oscillations, they could be "recharged" and
thus rejuvenated. A range of frequencies is necessary because the
cell and its parts respond to different frequencies |
Related posts:
Can Humans Live to 1,000? Some Experts Claim We Can — Others
Want to Prevent That
The Immortalist: Aubrey De Grey on Aging -Can
He Keep Us Young?
Enhancing Evolution: Do
Humans have a Moral and Ethical Duty to Improve the Human Race?
End of Aging -The
Next Great Paradigm Shift?
The Story of a Biologist & the Extension of the Human
Life Span
“ Longevity Genes” Solve
Centenarian Paradox
Pathway to Longevity
Discovered
“ Long Live The Queen!” Longevity & Queen
Bees
Links:
http://www.uab.es/servlet/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1096476786473&pagename=
UAB%2FPage%2FTemplatePlanaDivsNoticiesdetall¬iciaid=1208815810349
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030201&ct=1
http://www.nia.nih.gov/
http://med.stanford.edu/profiles/Stuart_Kim/
http://www2.genetics.uga.edu/faculty/bio-Promislow.html
|