All along, Industry and the Federal Government have
insisted that either:
not enough research has been done on EMF Bioeffects to
determine the potential risk, or
plenty of research has been done to determine that there
is no risk.
That these two positions seem to be mutually exclusive
appears to have eluded those in charge of public relations
... what is the source of this ambiguity? Is it accidental?
Is it intentional, and if so, why?
Do Governments Really Believe,
There Are No Dangerous
Bioeffects From EMF Exposure?
The Ambiguity
The terms risk and safe, which are essential to a meaningful
dialog on this issue, have in this context, undiscussed
controversial definitions, that is, they have been craftily
re-defined to mean something other than their intended,
(dictionay) definition. Safe and risk, as defined in
the dictionary, are absolutes. You are either safe, or
you are not safe. You are either at risk, or you are
not at risk.
A good example of disagreement is the NCRP pre-release
leak of "recommendations." This
is a group of people working on THE SAME REPORT, who completely
disagreed
on what the conclusions should be. Imagine people in different
agencies with mutually-exclusive interests, or people in
Industry, with jobs, and the future of whole technologies
at stake? (Here I am assuming the leak originated with
someone inside who thought the final recommendations would
not be consistant with the data.)
The people who make up the Federal Government do not
agree on EMR Bioeffects, so how can the Federal Government
appear to be consistent? Here are some contradictory
positions taken by various US Government agencies, or
agents.
National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council,
report, or press release, -- no danger,
National
Council on Radiation Protection, -- danger --
or maybe not,
National EMF
Advisory Committee, calls for Continued
Research on Electric and Magnetic Field Health Effects,
-- danger, "We take this action because, after perusal
of the pre-publication NAS/NRC report released October
31, 1996, we conclude that neither the press release
nor the Executive Summary of the report adequately reflects
the conclusions to be found in the body of the report.
... Contrary to reports in the popular press. the NAS/NRC
report does not state that extremely low magnetic fields
are safe. Rather, the report concludes that there is
an unexplained, but statistically reliable and robust
association between power transmission and distribution
systems and childhood cancer and that continued research
is necessary." |
Electromagnetic
Fields:
The Dark Side of Technology
by Herbert Ross, D.C.
and Keri Brenner, L.Ac.
with Burton Goldberg
Electromagnetic fields are a type of low-level radiation generated by computer
terminals, microwave ovens, and other electronic devices. The Earth itself produces
some energy fields that are detrimental to human health as well, commonly referred
to as geopathic stress. While the intensity of these fields is small, studies
continue to show that they may be a factor in a number of chronic illnesses,
including cancer, heart disease, and sleep disorders.
An electromagnetic field can be likened to an invisible
energy web (shaped somewhat like the contour lines on a
topographical map) produced by electricity that, in turn,
creates a magnetic field. While EMFs are part of nature
and in fact are radiated by the human body and its individual
organs, the quality and intensity (called respectively
frequency and gauss field strength) of the energy forming
this contoured web can either support or destroy health.
As a general rule, EMFs generated by technological devices
tend to be much more harmful than naturally occurring EMFs.
Researchers once thought EMFs, especially very low frequency
and extremely low frequency EMFs, were safe because they
were of such low strength compared to other forms of radiation,
such as those from a nuclear reactor or X rays. But now,
as technology proliferates and people are using more electronic
devices, some researchers suspect EMFs are contributing
to a subtle assault on people's immune systems and overall
health.
Electromagnetic changes in the environment can adversely
affect the energy balance of the human organism and contribute
to disease. We are surrounded by stress-producing electromagnetic
fields generated by the electrical wiring in homes and
offices, televisions, computers and video terminals, microwave
ovens, overhead lights, power lines, and the hundreds of
motors that can generate higher than normal gauss strengths
(magnetic energy measuring unit). EMFs interact with living
systems, affecting enzymes related to growth regulation,
pineal gland metabolism (regulation of the sleep hormone,
melatonin), and cell division and multiplication.Test
your Enviroment
WHAT IF...
Electromagnetic
Fields (EMF) are harmful???
 |
Robert
Rowen MD Discuss the Harmful Effects of EMF Radiation
Dr. Robert Rowen, MD is internationally known for his work in the
field of complementary, alternative and integrative medicine. He
is known ... all » as the Father of Medical Freedom for his
efforts to legalize alternative medicine in 1990 in Alaska.
The rare medical freedom he enjoyed in Alaska
enabled him to greatly expand his knowledge and
experience in a multitude
Watch
the Video |
And
what if was possible to help protect yourself, your
family, and friends
Dr. Nancy Wertheimer, who first published
the epidemiological study showing a correlation between
50-60-Hz power lines and the increased incidence of childhood
cancer in this country, has also performed similar research
on users of electric blankets. She has found that there
is a higher incidence of miscarriages among pregnant
women who use electric blankets as compared to pregnant
women who do not.
 |
Radiation
and Breast cancer
According to recent statistics, breast cancer in Australia effects
one in 14 women, kills one in 27 and is increasing at a rate of
3% annually.
In 1987 Stephens et al. in the paper, Electric
power use and breast cancer; a hypothesis, suggested
that electromagnetic fields (EMF's) reduce melatonin
production by the pineal gland and that melatonin
suppresses the development of breast cancer. (
3 ).
Interesting
article
Watch
the Video
|
 |
Electromagnetic
Radiation with Louis Slesin ECU #519
Dr. Louis Slesin, editor and publisher of Microwave News, a pioneer
in exposing the dangers of electromagnetic fields, points to the
sources of EMF-- from power lines to electric blankets to cellular
phones -- and describes the efforts by industry to downplay the effects
of EMF and outlines past and current research.
Watch
the video |
"You
can protect yourself from negative electromagnectic
fields..."
Powerful electromagnetic fields exist under overhead power
lines. The cables carried on pylons across the countryside
often have potentials of four hundred thousand volts or
more. If you stand under such a line you will often be
able to hear a rhythmic humming. In damp weather you can
hear the crackling as some of the electricity discharges
into the atmosphere.
 |
Folks
Worried About High Tension Power Lines
Residents near Sydney staged a dramatic demonstration of EMF concerns
by lighting up fluorescent lightbulbs - unplugged - underneath power
lines. (Sydney 7 News)
Fluorescent tubes light up by themselves under hi-volrage wires,
dogs die of cancer, etc.
Watch
the Video |
Under the more powerful lines the fields
will light up a fluorescent tube when someone stands underneath
the cables holding one end of the tube. ( Warning: This
is a potentially dangerous trick, so you should not try
it yourself!). At least one individual is on record who
remembered enough school science to erect a cable strung
between two poles under a power line near his home, connected
the ends to his household supply and got free power until
the authorities caught up with him and sued him for stealing
electricity! You do not need physical connections to extract
power from an electrical field.
The person with the fluorescent tube standing under the
power line also had electrical currents and voltages induced
in his body. This happens because the blood and other body
fluids conduct electricity and, as with any conductor in
a moving electric field, a current will be produced in
the body. You have seen how even the much lower voltages
of mains cables at home will produce this phenomenon and
you can demonstrate the effect using an earthed voltmeter
in the way described in the last chapter. Obviously the
effect will be much bigger directly under a pylon.
 |
PSC
Hearing: Ann Emersen\'s 2nd Testimony
Ann Emersen indicts the ATC and the PSC for covering up evidence
of the dangers posed by transmission lines.
Watch
the Video |
 |
PSC
Public Hearings: Don Moriva
Don Moriva explains the dangers of high tension lines, including
reduced melatonin production.
Watch
the Video |
Are
You and your Family in Danger? Test your Enviroment
You can alarmingly demonstrate this induction effect by
parking a vehicle (the larger the better) under a power
line' High static charges will build up m the metal body
and because of the rubber tyres will only slowly be discharged
to earth. A large spark will be produced if you reach out
to touch the van.
Despite these obvious anct measurable effects, the official
position of the electric power companies has always been
that, party tricks excepted, there is no possibility that
even long-term exposure to high electromagnetic fields
can have injurious effects on health.
 |
1
EMF Dangers
Can electromagnetic fields (EMF) from power lines, home wiring,
airport and military radar, substations, transformers, computers
and appliances cause brain tumors, leukemia, birth defects, miscarriages,
chronic fatigue, headaches, cataracts, heart problems, stress.
nausea, chest pain, forgetfulness, cancer and other health problems?
Watch
the Video
|
 |
2 EMF Dangers
Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of Public Health, State
University of New York believes it is likely that up to 30%
of all childhood cancers come from exposure to EMFs. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) warns "There is reason for concern" and
advises prudent avoidance".
Watch
the Video |
 |
3 EMF
Dangers3
In a draft report issued in March 1990, the EPA recommended that
EMFs be classified as a Class B carcinogen -- -a "probable human
carcinogen and joined the ranks of formaldehyde, DDT, dioxins and
PCBs.
After the EPA draft report was released, utility, military and computer
lobbyists came down hard on the EPA. The EPA's final revision did
NOT classify EMFs as a Class B carcinogen Rather, the following explanation
was added:"
At this time such a characterization regarding the link between cancer
and exposure to EMFs is not appropriate because the basic nature
of the interaction between EMFs and biological processes leading
to cancer is not understood."
Watch
the Video |
Are
You and your Family in Danger? Test your Enviroment
However, too many people who live in houses
under or near power ipines complain of a variety of symptoms
without apparent cause for such assurances to be accepted
without question. Some feel perpetually lacking in energy.
In worse cases, they may feel nauseous or dizzy. The long-term
effects remain to be assessed, but when we remember the
findings of Nancy Wertheimer there appears to be at least
a possibility of a link with cancer and there is current
litigation in both Britain and the USA against power transmission
companies which, if successful, will result in enormous
damages being paid to affected families.
www.leyman.demon.co.uk/ 03_Facts_and_Figures.html
 |
Radiation
Roulette
Are Xrays and Cat Scans exposing people to too much Radiation that
trigger cancer and emf sensitivity? One Cat Scan = 300 to 400 XRAYS.
A special report done by a Canadian woman on a quest to find the
answers. Clip from Radiation Roulette, aired on Passionate Eye,
CBC 2005
Watch
the Video |
"You
can protect yourself from negative electromagnectic
fields..."
In the News
Wi-Fi's Electric
Shock (Now Toronto News, March 15, 2006)
• Brain Tumor Scare Strikes Melbourne Office (Yahoo
News, May 11, 2006)
• Cordless Phones Danger (News of the
World, Feb 5, 2006)
• Mobile 'Puts 4-Year Olds at Risk from Radiation' (Telegraph
News, Nov 29, 2005)
• Court Victory is a First for Cell Phone Programmers (Sun
Sentinel, Oct 2, 2005)
• Electrical Fields Can Make You Sick (The
Sunday Times-Britain, Sep 11, 2005)
• Cell Phones May Cause Cataracts (IsraCast
Tech News, Jul 29, 2005)
• Kids at Risk? (Toronto Star, Jul 9, 2005)
• The Cell Phone Industry: Big Tobacco 2.0?
(CNET.com, Mar 8, 2005)
• Mobile Phones Tumour Risk to Young Children (London
Times, Jan. 12, 2005)
• Mobile Phone Radiation Harms DNA, New Study Finds (Reuters,
Dec 20, 2004)
• Mobiles Cut Sperm Count up to 30% in Men (MSN,
Jun 28, 2004)
• What Cell Phones Can Do To Youngster's Brain In 2
Minutes (U.K. Sunday Mirror, London, Apr 1, 2004)
• Mobile Phones 'May Trigger Alzheimer's' (BBC
News, Feb 5, 2003)
• How Cell Phones Cause Cancer (ZDNet UK, Jun
25, 2001)
Sleeping children wi-fi radiation warning May
21 2007
In the Press Dec 2007 |
Galen Hiernomyus:
Galen Hiernomyus, one of my teachers, would always
say to me, "forget everything that you have
learned! Just treat out the toxins poisons, pollutions,
vaccines, bacteria, dark forces, radiations, metals,
fungi, virus,and chemicals and you will have no disease!" This
is true, as we slowly rid the bodies of these intruders
we regain our health and youth.............. ' Radionics
Radionics Radionics!"
|
What if EMFs distrupt
sleep?
What if electromagnetic
fields (EMF) are harmful ???
Is it like Asking "What
if thalidomide causes deformities in children"?
The drugs Zomax, DES, and thalidiomide were all tested on animals and
judged safe, but had devestating consequences for the humans when they
used them. Studies show that more than half of prescription drugs drugs
approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1976 and 1985 caused
side effects that were serious enough to cause the drugs to be withdrawn
from the market
FDA
ON Thalidomide
 |
Sleeping
children wi-fi radiation warning
A Welsh radiation expert has warned of the dangers posed by wireless
internet technology to sleeping children.The fears come amid claims
that so-called "wi-fi" internet connections in schools
could damage children.
Watch
the Video
|
 |
Skull
Penetration of Cell Phone Radiation in Children!
Jun 01
Last April, while corporate “news managers” were guiding
the attention of Americans elsewhere, a London newspaper reported
on “What Cell Phones Can Do To Youngster's Brain In 2 Minutes”.
It turns out that a call lasting just two minutes
can open the “blood-brain barrier” in
kids as well as adults, allowing toxins in the
bloodstream to cross this blood vessel gateway
into the skull and attack brain cells. The same
two-minutes cell phone exposure also disrupts the
natural electrical activity of a child's brain
for up to an hour afterwards.
“Leading medical experts now question whether
it is safe for children to use mobile phones at
all,” reported the Mirror. “Doctors
fear that disturbed brain activity in children
could lead to psychiatric and behavioral problems
or impair learning ability.”
Watch
a Video on this subject |
Are
your Children in Danger? Test your Enviroment
EMFs: A
Health Concern in Schools
EMF Health Report, Vol. 1, No. 1,
A number of school boards across North America have taken
actions to limit exposure of school children to EMF. These
actions, based primarily on parental concerns rather than
on demonstrated health risks, have attempted to reduce
the exposure of children to magnetic field levels which
are typical of EMF exposures for the general public.
California. "High" EMF readings have prompted educators and
administrators to take action to minimize exposure to EMFs. At the Montague
Elementary School in Santa Clara, CA, 13 of the school's 15 teachers
have formally requested to be transferred because of the school's close
proximity to power lines. In addition, 4 classrooms, a day care center,
and a part of the playground located near power lines have been closed
off.
Before an evaluation of possible EMF-cancer associations
in southern Marin County, CA, was even completed, the Mill
Valley school district authorized up to $50,000 for new
light fixtures and wiring to reduce EMF emissions. These
expenses were approved by the school board after a district
survey showed high EMF levels. Mill Valley's Tam Valley
School took other cost-free precautions such as moving
desks away from fish tanks and relocating physical education
classes away from power lines.
New York. New York Attorney General Robert Abrams called
on the state's top seven utility companies to study EMFs
from power lines near schools in response to concern expressed
by the New York State United Teachers Union and other groups.
A study by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation has identified
35 schools in upstate New York which are in close proximity
to high-voltage power lines.
Canada. In Toronto, Ontario, parents were successful in
a campaign to relocate a kindergarten classroom and library
at a Bennington Heights elementary school. Concerns raised
over a proposed new kindergarten play area at the south
end of the school led parents to request magnetic field
measurements of the area. The school building is on a cliff
less than 100 feet from a 115-kV transmission line at the
same height. Measurements taken at the south end of the
school indicated levels about twice the average in the
rest of the school. After a series of public meetings and
additional consultant reviews, the school board decided
to relocate classes and a library to portable units at
the north end of the school, reserving the rooms at the
south end for occasional use for meetings.
What if EMF causes Cancer???
Our exposure to electromagnetic pollution has increased many
million times in the last 30 years
Schumann
Resonance
 |
Electromagnetic
Radiation
All of these effects have been shown in multiple studies for cancer
and miscarriage, neurological and cardiac effects. The results
are totally consistent with EMR being genotoxic, but also interfering
with the body's natural telecommunication system. The brain is
particularly sensitive because it is very electromagnetically active
as is shown by the EEG, and the brain communicates with the organs
and the cells of the body using enzymes, hormones and ion currents
for example. More than sixteen studies show that EMR across the
spectrum reduces human melatonin levels. Melatonin is a potent
antioxidant, and maintains the health of the immune system. Reduced
melatonin is associated with aging, sleep disturbance, chronic
fatigue, arthritis, diabetes, and also with cancer, miscarriage,
cardiac and neurological disease and death.
Dr Neil Cherry
Watch
A Video on this subject |
Are you at risk? Test your
enviroment
What
if your computer is harming your health???
Reduce exposures to EMF and HF radiation
Remember that the EM field radiated from an appliance drops off dramatically
in strength with increased distance from the source. There are a number of
ways to reduce harmful exposure to EMF. Some are as easy as standing back from
an appliance when it is in use.
If the measured radiation level of a cell phone is high, consider using shielded
accessories. If the problem persists, you may want to switch to another cell
phone or service company. Cell phone radiation levels vary from phone to phone
and from company to company. List
of SAR radiation levels for US mobile phones
Computer users may want to switch to flat panel display since these monitors
emit less EMF than the conventional CRT type of display.
Other EMF reduction steps, such as correcting a household-wiring problem, are
worth doing for safety reasons. The traditional way of grounding electrical devices
is to connect them to water pipes. However, today's pipes are mostly plastic
and do not provide good grounding. One suggestion is to find a pure metal pipe
and redo the wiring.
It is wise to reduce as much as possible the time spent near known sources of
strong EMF. Turn off all electrical appliances when you aren't using them.
|
EMF @ HOME
Danger
Zones
EMF
Levels From Common Sources in
Milligauss (mG)*
Recommended Safety Levels:
.5 mG to 2.5 mG with 1.0mG as preferred
standard.
Adverse biological effects have been found at 2.5mG |
Source |
Up
to 4 inches |
At
3 feet |
Blender |
50
to 220 |
.3
to 3 |
Clothes
Washer |
8
to 200 |
.1
to 4 |
Coffee
Maker |
6
to 29 |
.1 |
Computer |
4
to 20 |
2
to 5 |
Fluorescent
Lamp |
400
to 4,000 |
.1
to 5 |
Hair
Dryer |
60
to 20,000 |
.1
to 6 |
Microwave
Oven |
100
to 500 |
1.0
to 25 |
Television |
5
to 100 |
.1
to 6 |
Vacuum
Cleaner |
230
to 1300 |
3
to 40 |
Airplane |
50
mG average on 747 |
|
*Source:
USA Environmental Protection Agency |
Power Lines and Property Values:
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
EMF
Exposure @ Work
| Measurements in milligrams (mG) |
 |
 |
| The sewing machine operator
worked all day, took a 1-hour lunch break at 11:15
am, and took 10-minute breaks at 8:55 am and 2:55
pm. |
The mechanic repaired a
compressor at 9:45 am and 11:10 am |
 |
 |
| The electrician repaired
a large air-conditioning motor at 9:10 am and 11:45
am. |
The government worker was
at the copy machine at 8:00 am, at the computer from
11:00 am to 1:00 pm and also from 2:30 pm to 4:30
pm. |
Work
place EMF Spot Measurements
Questions
and Answers - EMF in the Workplace
What if your cellular
phones is causing tumors???
Old McDonald had a farm e-i-e-i-o.
And on his farm he had computer, cell phone, TV, stereo, VCR,
electric stove, e-i-e-i-o. With an EMF here and an ELF there,
oh-oh-oh-oh-oh.
A recent headline from the Associated Press:
"BE CAREFUL ABOUT CELL PHONES", The essence
of the article states that the British government issued
safety precautions amid safety worries in the use of cellular
phones. This is primarily true of children under the age
of 16. Evidence exists that using a cell phone may be a
health risk.
Syracuse Herald Journal
 |
Cell Towers are popping up in everyone's backyard
these days. Although most of us fail to realize the
dangers involved in having these monsters looming over
our neighborhoods or even strategically placed atop
our schools or churches. Not only are we are dealing
with the issue of greed, due mostly in part on the
high demand for wireless communication, but also something
more sinister. As long as the demand for wireless service
continues, so will the need for cell towers be. Do
we understand were sacrificing our health for the convenience
of "wireless freedom"? |
| Recent claim of 30% increase in brain tumours
found in regular mobile phone users - but result
not found in other studies. Brain cancers were most
frequently developed on side of head to which the
person held their phone. Biggest increase in cancerous
growths was in accoustic neuromas which form behind
the ear and are usually treated quite easily. Incidence
of these types of growths is increasing in the UK.
Analysis of 1,600 people with growths who had used
mobile phones for up to ten years before diagnosis.
risk increased with frequency and duration of exposure
to mobile phone radiation. Scientists compared tumour
victims with those who led similar lives but did
not use mobile phones, and also with another group
who had tumours but did not use mobile phones. Analogue,
digital and "cordless" DECT phones all
seem to carry risk. Study by Professor Kjell Mild,
Orebro University in Sweden - published in the International
Journal of Oncology March 2003 |
 |
|
List of SAR radiation
levels for US mobile phones |
 |
BBC3 Investigates
Mobile Phone Masts - Part 3 of 3
BBC3 Investigates Mobile Phone MastsPart 3 of 3An unbelievable
amount of these high-powered masts are whacking out masses amounts
of electromagnetic radiation. Same frequencies microwaves use,
but on a higher power level.Feeling tired?
Watch
the Video |
 |
Cell
Phone Dangers what they don't want you to see...
cell phones are dangerous you need protection from them
You don't have to suffer the harmful consequences of cell phone
radiation. The Next Generation RF3 Cellular Headset with AirCom2
Technology keeps potentially harmful radiation AWAY from your head.
Get one for your cell phone today
Watch
the Video |
 |
Cell
Phone Lies
The cell phone industry has been paying big bucks to keep the media
from exposing the truth about cell phones, and when the press does
talk, they send out media clips that twist the media back in the
direction they wanted you to see it. Your Health is being effected
wheather you beleive it or not. Watch as officials in various nations
lie about electromagnetic radiation exposure.
Watch
the Video |
 |
Cell
Phone Radiation Test
Are
you in Danger???
You can now buy the tester
Watch
the Video |
|
Cell
Phone War
The truth of cell phones has been buried by the industry, the health
officials and governments. Health effects from radiation exposure
is being allowed to continue
In only the past year, scientific knowledge about the mobile phone
health problem has doubled, even as efforts to suppress it have
increased!
Watch
the Video |
 |
Cell
phones cause serious health problems
The microwave radiation from mobile phones have harmful effects
at intensity levels far below the official safety threshold values
. This is confirmed by a considerable body of evidence.
Watch
the Video |
 |
Dr.
George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interview
TV Interview with Dr. Carlo (Campbell Live, TV3)Dr. Carlo talks
about the cell phone industry's marketing towards children and
the epidemic projections from cell phone use
Dr. George Carlo, former chief scientist of the $28 million research
into cell phone safety, talks about his alarming findings.
Watch
the Video |
 |
Invisible
Poison? Detecting Dangerous Levels of Radiation
Investigative Report: Sam Houston
Energy Cooperative, or SHECO, - an energy cooperative
servicing East Texas - is accused of questionable
business decisions and tactics. This investigative
report is part of one man's quest to find answers.
In this installment of Investigative Report, George
H. Russell illustrates how much radiation electrical
power lines can emit and how dangerous this can be
for the community.
Watch
the Video
|
| |
Dutch researchers recently studied
72 radiation exposed volunteers in laboratories
that used both the "traditional" and
the new high-tech cell phones without telling them
which type of radiation they were being exposed
to.
Of the 72 people who participated in the study,
half experienced nausea, headaches and a tingling
sensation from the radiation level of the new
cell phone towers. The radiation level from those
traditional cell phone towers brought no noticeable
physical effects.
Researcher Maarten Lortzer said the findings "were
very unexpected. It means that there are a whole
lot of other questions coming up."
The research team now wants to know if the
old towers are replaced with new ones to service
the popular new phones, what will it do to people
living in the neighborhood. |
|
Celphone tower towards
rest home
The electromagnetic radiation emitted by the towers
and mobile telephones affect living cells. A study
earlier this year published in the International
Journal of Oncology suggests that mobile phone
users have a 30 percent risk of brain tumors that
occur close to the year used for phone listening.
Earlier studies show that leukemia cells begin
growing dramatically during exposure to mobile
phone radiation.
Nematode worms in the earth around the base of
towers release stress hormones, grow larger than
normal and produce more eggs; a natural sign that
the creatures are threatened by the radiation.
The cell phone companies have since come out with
new studies that show that public health is in
little or no risk of danger from cell phone radiation
exposure.
Watch
a Video on this subject |
If electromagnetic
fields (EMF) are harmful
"THEN PERHAPS THESE
MAY HELP"
EMF
Detection Are you at risk???
Electrosmog METERS
TRIFIELD
METER
Isnt this interesting
The Commission is closely monitoring new developments
in scientific research and international regulatory action
in the field of EMF. There is for the moment a lack of
data concerning long-term effects of low exposure; large-scale
epidemiological studies are presently being conducted.
In response to growing concerns amongst the general public,
specifically about EMF exposure from mobile phones and
transmitter masts, and the rapid increase in the application
of new technologies using radio-frequencies, the Commission
asked in January 2001 the competent scientific committee
to update the existing scientific advice on health risks
associated with the exposure to electromagnetic fields
in the light of new evidence on exposure and research on
health effects. The Committee on Toxicology, Eco-toxicology
and the Environment has adopted this opinion(56KB) on October
30, 2001.
The Doll Report
The NRPB (National Radiation Protection Board - UK) Advisory Group on
Non-ionising Radiation (AGNIR) headed by sir Richard Doll produced a
report titled, ELF Electromagnetic Fields and the Risk of Cancer in March
2001. The report concluded that; unless ... further research indicates
that the finding is due to chance or some currently unrecognised artefact,
the possibility remains that intense and prolonged exposures to magnetic
fields (from powerlines) can increase the risk of leukaemia in children.
The inconclusive nature of this finding is due to the low relative risk
and the lack of supporting evidence such as a
biological mechanism or dose response curve etc.
There is screed,s of information out there, for and against
the ideas in this newsletter, one has to wonder seriously
if there are dangers in magnetic fields, personally we
measure our environment and try and stay in the researched
safe zone, one can never be to careful, and trusting big
business and Governments to tell the whole truth,well.
that's another story,,,
Are
You and your Family in Danger? Test your Enviroment
Schumann
Resonance |
