Wound Healing
Static magnetic fields on postoperative wounds in 21 patients undergoing plastic
surgery. Magnetic patches ranging in thickness from 1 to 6 mm, and 2450 to
3950 G field strength were administered over the area of operation for a
total of 48 hours. Thirteen patients received the magnets after pain or edema
had appeared and 8 received them prophylactically. Results showed a decrease
in pain, edema, and coloration in approximately 60 percent of patients. Such
symptoms disappeared entirely in 75 percent.
Pulsating electromagnetic field either alone or in combination with laser
therapy exhibited healing effects with respect to peripheral nerve lesions
and general wound healing relative to controls.
The effects of postoperative nonthermal pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic
fields on edema formation and bruise healing in boys undergoing orchidopexy.
Treatment involved exposure 3 times daily for the first 4 days following surgery.
Significant effects with respect to rate of bruise resolution were reported
in patients receiving the treatment relative to controls.
B. Vukovic-Jankovic, Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Stimu-lated Pulsating Electromagnetic
(PEMF) Field and Laser, Second World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism
in Biology and Medicine, R.H.C. Bentall H.B. Eckstein, A Trial Involving the
Use of Pulsed Electro-Magnetic Therapy on Children Undergoing Orchidopexy.
Ulcers (Gastric and Duodenal)
The administration of mill metric electromagnetic waves helped to normalize blood
properties, subsequently improving the effectiveness of more conventional gastric
and duodenal ulcer treatment.
Millimeter wave (MW) therapy in 317 patients suffering from duodenal and gastric
ulcers. MW therapy consisted of 30 minutes per day exposure of the epigastric
area apparatus,(10 mW/cm2, 5.6-mm wavelength) until complete ulcer cicatrisation
was achieved. Results showed a 95-percent rate of ulcer cicatrisation in patients
receiving the treatment.
Extremely-high-frequency therapy to be an effective treatment in patients
suffering from duodenal ulcers. Treatment consisted of 5-10 exposures, lasting
20-30 minutes, and making use of the G4-142 apparatus (53.5-70.0 GHz frequency
range).
M.V. Poslavskii, Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Electromagnetic Irradiation of
the Millimetric Range. Experience with Application of Millimeter-Range Radiation
for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Stomach and Duodenal Ulcer M.V. Teppone, Extremely-High
Frequency Therapy of Duodenal Ulcer, Klin Med, 9(10), 1991, p. 74-77.
Ulcers (Trophic)
Magnetotherapy coupled with galvanization and intratissue electrophoresis in
86 patients suffering from trophic ulcers. A "Potok-1" apparatus
with a density of current equal to 0.05-0.1 mA/cm2 was used to create an
electrical field. The "MAG-30 apparatus for low-frequency magnetotherapy
with induction of 30 mT and area of exposure of 20 cm2 was applied to a trophic
ulcer site at the same time. Magnetogalvanotherapy is the recommended treatment
for trophic ulcers of the lower extremities
Treatment with non thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy (PEMET) accelerated
would healing in spinal cord injury patients suffering from stage II and
III pressure ulcers. PEMET treatment consisted of pulsed 27.12-MHz energy
produced via a Diapulse device. Energy was delivered the use of a treatment
head placed in wound dressings, in 30-minute periods twice a day for 12 weeks
or until sores healed.
C.A. Salzberg, The Effects of Non-Thermal Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy on
Wound Healing of Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord-Injured Patients
Healing
Morphological evaluation of fibroblasts after stimulation with static magnetic
field & PEMF
Electromagnetic fields and magnets - treatment for musculoskeletal disorders
Clinical effectiveness of magnetic field therapy - a review of the literature
Evolution of magnetic therapy from alternative to traditional medicine
Pulsed magnetotherapy in Czechoslovakia - a review
Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morphological evaluation of MRC-5 fibroblasts after stimulation with static
magnetic field and pulsating electromagnetic field.
Pate K, Benghuzzi H, Tucci M, Puckett A, Cason Z.
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
The quality of tissue repair and the speed with which that repair
can be accomplished are the two major variables in the healing of any injury.
Today, magnetic field
exposure to traumatized areas has shown to be a promising tool in the healing
process. The exact mode of action by which radiating and unchanging magnetic
fields still has to be elucidated. The objective of this study was to evaluate
the morphology of MRC-5 fibro-blasts after stimulation with static and pulsating
magnetic fields. Under sterile environment, a total of 24 wells were loaded
with 50,000 MRC-5 cells each and further divided into three groups. Groups
1 and 2 were exposed to magnetic fields, static and pulsating respectively.
Group 3 wells were unexposed and served as the control group. The cells were
monitored at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours and representative views were captured
using digital analysis techniques. The live cells were screened for cellular
mobility, cell distribution, and cellular morphology (size, shape, lysis, and
background). After 72 hours, the supernatants and cells of all three groups
were collected and MDA analysis was performed to determine possible cellular
damage. Group 1 cells continued to grow at a reasonable rate, but there was
substantial cell membrane damage (high MDA levels, p < 0.05). Group 2 cells
appeared to be very stressed under these conditions especially at the initial
phase (24 hours). In conclusion, the use of pulsating magnetic stimulation
can be beneficial in the healing process of soft tissues.
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;39:460-5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal
disorders.
Trock DH.
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Certain pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) affect the growth of bone and
cartilage in vitro, with potential application as an arthritis treatment. PEMF
stimulation is already a proven remedy for delayed fractures, with potential
clinical application for osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of bone, osteoporosis,
and wound healing. Static magnets may provide temporary pain relief under certain
circumstances. In both cases, the available data is limited. The mechanisms
underlying the use of PEMF and magnets are discussed.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000 Feb;26(1):51-62, viii.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clinical effectiveness of magnetic field therapy--a review of the literature.
Quittan M, Schuhfried O, Wiesinger GF, Fialka-Moser V.
Universitatsklinik fur Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Wien. michael.quittan@akh-wien.ac.at
To verify the efficacy of electromagnetic fields on various diseases we conducted
a computer-assisted search of the pertinent literature. The search was performed
with the aid of the Medline and Embase database (1966-1998) and reference lists.
Clinical trials with at least one control group were selected. The selection
criteria were met by 31 clinical studies. 20 trials were designed double-blind,
randomised and placebo-controlled. The studies were categorised by indications.
Electromagnetic fields were applied to promote bone-healing, to treat osteoarthritis
and inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system, to alleviate pain,
to enhance healing of ulcers and to reduce spasticity. The action on bone healing
and pain alleviation of electromagnetic fields was confirmed in most of the
trials. In the treatment of other disorders the results are contradictory.
Application times varied between 15 minutes and 24 hours per day for three
weeks up to eighteen months. There seems to be a relationship between longer
daily application time and positive effects particular in bone-healing. Patients
were treated with electromagnetic fields of 2 to 100 G (0.2 mT to 10 mT) with
a frequency between 12 and 100 Hz. Optimal dosimetry for therapy with electromagnetic
fields is yet not established.
Acta Med Austriaca. 2000;27(3):61-8.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evolution of magnetic therapy from alternative to traditional medicine.
Vallbona C, Richards T.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,
Texas, USA.
Static or electromagnetic fields have been used for centuries to control pain
and other biologic problems, but scientific evidence of their effect had not
been gathered until recently. This article explores the value of magnetic therapy
in rehabilitation medicine in terms of static magnetic fields and time varying
magnetic fields (electromagnetic). A historical review is given and the discussion
covers the areas of scientific criteria, modalities of magnetic therapy, mechanisms
of the biologic effects of magnetic fields, and perspectives on the future
of magnetic therapy.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999 Aug;10(3):729-54.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pulsed magnetotherapy in Czechoslovakia--a review.
Jerabek J.
National Institute of Public Health, Praha, Czech Republic.
Pulsed magnetotherapy has been used in Czechoslovakia for more than one decade.
It has been proved that this type of physical therapy is very efficient mainly
in rheumatic diseases, in paediatrics (sinusitis, enuresis), and in balneological
care of patients suffering from ischaemic disorders of lower extremities. Promising
results have also been obtained in neurological diseases (multiple sclerosis,
spastic conditions) and in ophthalmology, in degenerative diseases of the retina.
Rev Environ Health. 1994 Apr-Jun;10(2):127-34.
|